Abstract

Soil-facing mechanical interactions play an important role in the behavior of earth-retaining walls. Generally, numerical analysis of earth-retaining structures requires the use of interface elements between dissimilar component materials to model soil–structure interactions and to capture the transfer of normal and shear stresses through these discontinuities. In finite element method software programs, soil–structure interactions can be modeled using “zero-thickness” interface elements between the soil and structural components. These elements use a strength/stiffness reduction factor that is applied to the soil adjacent to the interface. However, in some numerical codes where the zero-thickness elements (or other similar special interface elements) are not available, the use of continuum elements to model soil–structure interactions is the only option. The continuum element approach allows more control of the interface features (i.e., material strength and stiffness properties), as well as the element sizes and shapes at the interfaces. This article proposes parameter values for zero-thickness elements that will give the same numerical outcomes as those using continuum elements in finite element and finite difference commercial software. The numerical results show good agreement for the computed loads transferred from soil to structure using both methods (i.e., zero-thickness elements and continuum elements at interfaces). Both different interface modeling approaches can give very similar results using equivalent interface property values and demonstrate the influence of choice of numerical mesh size on the numerical outcomes when continuum elements are used at the interfaces.

Highlights

  • Soil-facing mechanical interactions play an important role in the behavior of earth-retaining walls

  • The results showed that the optimized mesh with the lowest interface continuum element aspect ratio experienced the smallest stress fluctuation amplitudes

  • This study presents numerical predictions of normal and shear stresses at the interface between soil and a concrete facing using two interface modeling approaches with equivalent interface properties based on the Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Soil-facing mechanical interactions play an important role in the behavior of earth-retaining walls. Because soil-facing interaction is required in 3D analyses (e.g., the inside surface of the facing in reinforced soil wall modeling cases, FIGURE 4 | Load transfer from backfill soil to facing panel using PLAXIS: normal and shear stresses at the interface between facing structure and backfill soil with optimized mesh for three different strength/stiffness reduction factors: (A) Ri = 0.3, (B) Ri = 0.6, and (C) Ri = 1.0 (Damians et al 2015b). The normal stress and shear stress (τs) are calculated based on the interface normal displacement (un) and shear displacement (us) using the following equations: σn knun τs τkss,umsax kkssuuss ≤> ττss,,mmaaxx (12) (13)

CONCLUSIONS
Findings
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.