Abstract
Four sets of econometric models are presented for time use decisions (durations and start times) regarding the basic, regular, and committed components (skeleton) of workers’ daily life: gap before work, work, gap after work, and night sleep. Two types of models are compared for each component: multilevel linear models and continuous-time hazard models. The multilevel models consider three-level random effects (temporal, personal, and household) and the hazard models consider individual-based unobserved heterogeneity. On the basis of performance in fitting observed data, hazard models are selected for the first three components, and a multilevel model is selected for the last component. For parametric hazard models, the Gompertz distribution shows promising performance in fitting activity data. The models are estimated by using 2002–2003 Toronto [Canada] Computerized Household Activity Scheduling Elicitor data.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
