Abstract

Optimal stopping problems require people to choose from a sequence of values presented sequentially, under the constraint that it is not possible to return to an earlier option. Usually, the distribution from which values are drawn is the same for each option in the sequence. We consider an extension in which the distributions change in a known way over options. Based on an experimental task involving mate selection, we study people’s optimal stopping behavior in two different changing environments. Basic empirical results, and a cognitive modeling analysis, find evidence that people use relatively simple cognitive strategies to set internal thresholds that guide their decision-making. Using the model-based analysis, we reach some conclusions about the nature of individual difference in strategy use and the optimality of the thresholds people use. In particular, we find that while people are sensitive to environmental distributions, they typically use thresholds that start too low for early options, and often decrease their thresholds too quickly.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.