Abstract

At the level of design of thermal power plants (TPP), when making decisions related to the choice of its macro location and micro location, disposition solution and equipment structure, the choice of the right decision method is of particular importance. Multi criteria analysis involves solving inadequately structured problems, while in practical terms it is a necessary tool in solving the day-to-day tasks of decision-making, management actions, both at the design level and the exploitation of complex energy and process systems. The development of new methods and the improvement of existing multi criteria analysis methods have influenced their increasing application in the field of energy, from both theoretical and practical aspects. A particular segment of the application of multi criteria analysis methods is to make strategic or operational decisions when solving multidisciplinary problems with predominantly technical or predominantly economic content, whether looking at a part or the energy system as a whole. The application of these methods in choosing the right solutions in the decision-making tasks of management in the design, maintenance and operation of thermal power plants is based on the development of information technology and computer technology. There are several methods in use today, of which the following should be emphasized: PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization METHod of Enrichment Evaluation), AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), IKOR, ELECTRE (ELimination Et Choice Translating REality), MAX-MIN, MAX-MAX, Hurwicz (combination of max-max and max-min methods), SAW (Simple Additive Weighting Method), TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution), conjunctive method, disjunctive method, etc. Depending on the method used, the ranking of alternatives or criteria, the best alternative or criterion or set of alternatives or criteria that meet certain conditions is obtained as a solution. Problems that can be considered using multi-criteria decision-making have certain common characteristics: a large number of criteria that must be created by the decision maker, a high likelihood of conflict between the criteria, inseparable (different) units of measure (as a rule, each criterion has different units of measure), as well as design or the choice of optimal concepts in a predetermined space. Solutions are either designing the best alternative or choosing the best action from a set of predefined final actions. This paper provides a brief description of the more important methods, along with an analysis of their advantages and disadvantages, as well as the possibility of applying them to solve the specific problem of choosing a micro location for TPP. Starting from the application of the modified multi criteria method for determining the priorities between individual alternatives for ranking and selecting the optimal micro location within a certain macro location within a predetermined framework, in a decision situation involving a number of decision makers of different specialty, examples of micro location selection for new thermal power facilities of TPP Stanari are given, TPP Gacko 2 and TPP Ugljevik 3, with preliminary definition of elimination criteria and criteria for comparison of locations of given TPPs.

Highlights

  • The thermal power plants (TPP) design and construction process includes a number of activities, ranging from the preparatory and exploration phase related to the location, location conditions analysis, through coal reserves and quality to the design, construction and installation phase, commissioning labor and commercial exploitation

  • Sometimes these solutions are very expensive and do not follow the trend of development of new technologies and use of new equipment in the field of thermal power engineering, so it is necessary to evaluate variant solutions according to certain criteria and conditions, which will be applied in the process of comparison and selection of selected micro locations for TPP implementation in within a pre-selected macro location

  • The macrolocation for each of the coal mines in the observed region is defined by specific strategic documents at the republic or local level. Sometimes these solutions are very expensive and do not follow the trend of development of new technologies and use of new equipment in the field of thermal power and energy as a whole, so it is necessary to evaluate variant solutions according to certain criteria and conditions, which will be applied in the process of comparison and selection of selected microlocations for the implementation of TPP within a pre-selected macro location

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The thermal power plants (TPP) design and construction process includes a number of activities, ranging from the preparatory and exploration phase related to the location (design substrates), location conditions analysis (substrate analysis), through coal reserves and quality to the design, construction and installation phase, commissioning labor and commercial exploitation. Macro location for each of the coal mines from the observed region is defined by specific strategic documents at the republic or local level Sometimes these solutions are very expensive and do not follow the trend of development of new technologies and use of new equipment in the field of thermal power engineering, so it is necessary to evaluate variant solutions according to certain criteria and conditions, which will be applied in the process of comparison and selection of selected micro locations for TPP implementation in within a pre-selected macro location. Starting from the earlier principle of energy development planning, which meant meeting the requirements of energy consumers with minimal economic costs, it is necessary to include requirements related to the environment and society itself, starting from the earliest stage of design and development of project documentation, where the choice of micro location is important a prerequisite for ensuring sustainable energy development (Bishnoi and Basu, 2005)

Description of the Elimination Criteria for TPP Location Selection
Description of Comparison Criteria for TPP Location Selection
Concordance methods
The Dimension of the Problem and the Preliminary Weight of the Evaluation
Problem Solving Phases
Dimensions of Problems and Preliminary Weighting of Evaluation Criteria
Defining and Adjusting the Weights of the Criteria and Types of Preference for
Matching Weights of Criteria for Comparison of TPP Micro-Locations
Findings
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.