Abstract
Automotive stampings undergo complex strain paths during drawing, stretching, and bending operations which develop large plastic strain gradients within the material. Aluminum sheet alloys are increasingly used for vehicle structure lightweighting, but limited formability and high levels of springback present challenges to the manufacturing and assembly processes. The current work explores the springback levels in AA6016-T4 sheet after pure bending operations. Finite element modeling is performed using both isotropic and elasto-plastic self-consistent (EPSC) crystal plasticity approaches. The EPSC model incorporates backstresses informed by GND content, as measured via high-resolution EBSD. Its predictions are shown to be more accurate than those of the isotropic model. The benefits and limitations of the current EPSC model are discussed.KeywordsFinite element modelingElasto-plastic self-consistent (EPSC) modelSpringback behavior
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
