Abstract

In computerized testing, the test takers' responses as well as their response times on the items are recorded. The relationship between response times and response accuracies is complex and varies over levels of observation. For example, it takes the form of a tradeoff between speed and accuracy at the level of a fixed person but may become a positive correlation for a population of test takers. In order to explore such relationships and test hypotheses about them, a conjoint model is proposed. Item responses are modeled by a two-parameter normal-ogive IRT model and response times by a lognormal model. The two models are combined using a hierarchical framework based on the fact that response times and responses are nested within individuals. All parameters can be estimated simultaneously using an MCMC estimation approach. A R-package for the MCMC algorithm is presented and explained.

Highlights

  • When computerized tests are administered, are the responses to the test items and the times used to produce them are automatically recorded

  • One approach is to model the response times with time parameters added to a regular item response theory (IRT) model

  • This product can be considered as a conjoint IRT model for the analysis of discrete and continuous data for measuring test takers’s speed and ability on test items

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When computerized tests are administered, are the responses to the test items and the times used to produce them are automatically recorded. Since the responses and response times are conditionally independent, their joint distribution is the product of a binomial and a normal distribution This product can be considered as a conjoint IRT model for the analysis of discrete and continuous data for measuring test takers’s speed and ability on test items. The beneficial effects of modeling response-time data jointly with response data were assessed by comparing the accuracies of the ability estimates in a stand-alone IRT and a conjoint IRT approach. This was done for different covariances between the speed and ability parameter, different sample sizes, and different numbers of items.

A conjoint IRT modeling approach
Models at level 1
Hierarchical structure at levels 2 and 3
Incorporating identifying restrictions in the priors
An MCMC algorithm
Goodness of fit
Package cirt
Response-time based IRT parameter estimation
Concluding remarks

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.