Abstract

In this study, the failure behavior at the interface of ductile materials is investigated. In order to capture the degradation of the tractions at the interface, a cohesive zone (CZ) model is applied. The choice of the type of the CZ approach, i.e. either intrinsic or extrinsic, brings about different drawbacks. The former includes an elastic regime at the interface prior to the failure, which can result in numerical difficulties whereas the latter necessitates the re-meshing of the structure during crack propagation. In order to overcome these problems, the incomplete interior penalty Galerkin variant of the discontinuous Galerkin (DG) method is applied both at the interface and in the bulk instead of the standard conforming finite element method. In addition, the application of the DG method enables to use nonmatching meshes in the discretized model. To treat the bulk, an elastoplastic material model with isotropic hardening as well as different hardening rules for small strains is incorporated into the DG framework. Two numerical examples are computed to study the convergence behavior of the new cohesive discontinuous Galerkin (CDG) method in comparison to that of the conventional models. The new CDG method outperforms the conventional CZ continuous Galerkin elements in the presence of locking effects as well as hanging nodes.

Highlights

  • In the world of engineering, the prediction of failure plays an important role when it comes to material modeling

  • The choice of the type of the cohesive zone (CZ) approach, i.e. either intrinsic or extrinsic, brings about different drawbacks. The former includes an elastic regime at the interface prior to the failure, which can result in numerical difficulties whereas the latter necessitates the re-meshing of the structure during crack propagation

  • In order to overcome these problems, the incomplete interior penalty Galerkin variant of the discontinuous Galerkin (DG) method is applied both at the interface and in the bulk instead of the standard conforming finite element method

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the world of engineering, the prediction of failure plays an important role when it comes to material modeling. The embedment of CZ models into standard conforming finite elements usually results in some restrictions at the interface These can be the occurrence of the initial elastic regime prior to failure as in intrinsic CZ models or the necessity of re-meshing of the structure during the crack propagation as in extrinsic approaches [7]. Cracks ( known as strong discontinuities) can propagate through the existing inherent weak discontinuities in the DG elements either within the bulk [18] or at the interface [19] Another advantage of the use of the discontinuous Galerkin method lies in the removal of locking effects [20,21,22,23].

Strong form
Weak form
Kinematic assumptions and modeling of plasticity
Numerical examples
Single-edge notched specimen
Fiber composite structure
Findings
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.