Abstract

Coupled fire-atmosphere models are increasingly being used to study low-intensity fires, such as those that are used in prescribed fire applications. Thus, the need arises to evaluate these models for their ability to accurately represent fire spread in marginal burning conditions. In this study, wind and fuel data collected during the Prescribed Fire Combustion and Atmospheric Dynamics Research Experiments (RxCADRE) fire campaign were used to generate initial and boundary conditions for coupled fire-atmosphere simulations. We present a novel method to obtain fuels representation at the model grid scale using a combination of imagery, machine learning, and field sampling. Several methods to generate wind input conditions for the model from eight different anemometer measurements are explored. We find a strong sensitivity of fire outcomes to wind inputs. This result highlights the critical need to include variable wind fields as inputs in modeling marginal fire conditions. This work highlights the complexities of comparing physics-based model results against observations, which are more acute in marginal burning conditions, where stronger sensitivities to local variability in wind and fuels drive fire outcomes.

Highlights

  • Interest has been growing in the application of coupled fire-atmosphere modeling to study prescribed fires burning in marginal burn conditions [1,2]

  • No such comparisons have been performed under marginal burning conditions, in part because no well-characterized data sets were available until the Prescribed Fire Combustion and Atmospheric Dynamics Research Experiments (RxCADRE) [4]

  • Leveraging the fuel and wind measurements collected as part of the 2012 RxCADRE campaign, we have explored physics-based simulations of low-intensity fire in marginal conditions with FIRETEC [29,30,31], a coupled fire-atmosphere model, and compared results to observed fire behavior [31,32,33]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Interest has been growing in the application of coupled fire-atmosphere modeling to study prescribed fires burning in marginal burn conditions [1,2]. This is the reason why most empirical models are developed based on statistical analysis of numerous observations To date, no such comparisons have been performed under marginal burning conditions, in part because no well-characterized data sets were available until the Prescribed Fire Combustion and Atmospheric Dynamics Research Experiments (RxCADRE) [4]. Leveraging the fuel and wind measurements collected as part of the 2012 RxCADRE campaign, we have explored physics-based simulations of low-intensity fire in marginal conditions with FIRETEC [29,30,31], a coupled fire-atmosphere model, and compared results to observed fire behavior [31,32,33]. We present lessons learned regarding data requirements for initializing and bounding simulations of marginal-burning fires

Experimental Data
A81 A26 A80 A31 A60 A73 A41 A42
Temporal Wind Variability
Spatial Wind Variability
Wind Initial and Boundary Conditions
Ignition
Modeling Results and Discussion Fire Spread
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call