Abstract
Several approaches exist to model interactions between latent variables. However, it is unclear how these perform when item scores are skewed and ordinal. Research on Type D personality serves as a good case study for that matter. In Study 1, we fitted a multivariate interaction model to predict depression and anxiety with Type D personality, operationalized as an interaction between its two subcomponents negative affectivity (NA) and social inhibition (SI). We constructed this interaction according to four approaches: (1) sum score product; (2) single product indicator; (3) matched product indicators; and (4) latent moderated structural equations (LMS). In Study 2, we compared these interaction models in a simulation study by assessing for each method the bias and precision of the estimated interaction effect under varying conditions. In Study 1, all methods showed a significant Type D effect on both depression and anxiety, although this effect diminished after including the NA and SI quadratic effects. Study 2 showed that the LMS approach performed best with respect to minimizing bias and maximizing power, even when item scores were ordinal and skewed. However, when latent traits were skewed LMS resulted in more false-positive conclusions, while the Matched PI approach adequately controlled the false-positive rate.
Highlights
In the social and behavioral sciences, researchers commonly investigate the effect of an interaction between two predictors on an outcome variable
Sum score approach According to the Sum score approach, the models including the interaction between negative affectivity (NA) and social inhibition (SI) fitted the data better than the models without the interaction term
To summarize, according to all six methods, the interaction between NA and SI was significantly associated with both depression and anxiety, the size of this interaction varied across the tested methods
Summary
In the social and behavioral sciences, researchers commonly investigate the effect of an interaction between two predictors on an outcome variable. Such interaction effects have been analyzed by including the product of the sum scores of two interaction constructs in a standard regression analysis. The construct of Type D personality (Denollet, 2005) serves as a great case study for this matter, because according to some authors (Smith, 2011), the Type D effect is hypothesized to constitute a statistical interaction between the construct’s two subcomponents, which are both measured by items on an ordinal scale with skewed response distributions. We will study the relation between Type D personality,
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.