Abstract
Simulating fragment penetration into steel involves complicated modeling of severe behavior of the materials through multiple phases of response. Penetration of a fragment-like projectile was simulated using finite element (FE) and meshfree particle formulations. Extreme deformation and failure of the material during the penetration event were modeled with several approaches to evaluate each as to how well it represents the actual physics of the material and structural response. A steel Fragment Simulating Projectile (FSP) – designed to simulate a fragment of metal from a weapon casing – was simulated for normal impact into a flat square plate. A range of impact velocities was used to examine levels of exit velocity ranging from relatively small to one on the same level as the impact velocity. The numerical code EPIC, used for all the simulations presented herein, contains the element and particle formulations, as well as the explicit methodology and constitutive models needed to perform these simulations. These simulations were compared against experimental data, evaluating the damage caused to the projectile and the target plates, as well as comparing the residual velocity when the projectile perforated the target.
Highlights
Structures and vehicles have increasingly either been designed to protect their occupants from penetration of fragments or their level of protection against a variety of attacks has been assessed
This study examines the impact of a steel projectile onto flat, square, steel plates
The Fragment Simulating Projectile (FSP) is colored in red, the part of the plate that has not failed is grey, and the failed parts are converted into particles, represented by small dots in these figures
Summary
Structures and vehicles have increasingly either been designed to protect their occupants from penetration of fragments or their level of protection against a variety of attacks has been assessed. This study examines the impact of a steel projectile onto flat, square, steel plates These plates represent a basic structural component that could be used in buildings or vehicles to resist penetration and protect the occupants. Meshfree/meshless methods, such as the Reproducing Kernel Particle Method (RKPM) [1,2,3] and Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) [4,5,6,7,8], have been put forth as alternatives to traditional finite elements when damage and failure of a material are modeled These particle methods have the intrinsic advantage over finite elements of not requiring element connectivity. A mesh can only break apart by either elemental removal or separation at elemental interfaces
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.