Abstract

Problem: There is a lack of work examining children’s social networks outside of the classroom and dynamic network analysis with small networks is one way to see how children influence one another socially over time. The current study utilized an existing database of two after-school care programs represented as networks of friendship connections between children in each program. The children were aged 5 to 12 years old and information was collected at three time points on their activity levels, who they were friends with in the program, and other covariates, such as sex, race/ethnicity, and obesity. We examined whether or not children influence one another’s activity levels through their direct friendship connections. Methods: Dynamic social network analyses were deployed using three different models: separable temporal exponential random graph models (STERGMs), stochastic actor-based models to replicate the original analyses, and models based on the work of Kindermann (2007). Summary: Findings indicate that activity levels are not important when children are forming friendships, but having a friend with a similar level of activity makes a child less likely to end the friendship.

Highlights

  • PREFACE Manuscript format has been used in the preparation and dissemination of this master’s thesis

  • We examined whether or not children influence one another’s activity levels through their direct friendship connections by deploying three different network models: separable temporal exponential random graph models (STERGMs), stochastic actor-based models to replicate the original analyses, and models based on the work of Kindermann (2007)

  • Modeling Dynamic Social Networks of Children in After-School Care Programs Why should we study children’s social networks? Children are born into social networks, which consist mostly of family members at infancy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

PREFACE Manuscript format has been used in the preparation and dissemination of this master’s thesis. Children’s social networks have previously been studied with a focus on adolescent peer-to-peer influences (e.g., DeLay, Ha, Van Ryzin, Winter, & Dishion, 2016; Valente, Fujimoto, Chou, & Spruijt-Metz, 2009), specific subpopulations of children, such as children with autism (Anderson, Locke, Kretzmann, & Kasari, 2016), or within a classroom setting (e.g., Cooc & Kim, 2017; Golemiec, Schneider, Boyce, Bush, Adler, & Levine, 2016; Laninga-Wijnen, Ryan, Harakeh, Shin, & Vollebergh, 2017).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.