Abstract
Probabilistic Safety Assessments (PSAs) are increasingly being used as a tool for supporting the acceptabilty of design, procurement, construction, operation, and maintenance activities at nuclear power plants. Since the issuance of Generic Letter 88-20 [1] and subsequent Individual Plant Examinations (IPEs)/Individual Plant Examinations for External Events (IPEEEs) [2], the NRC has issued several Regulatory Guides such as RG 1.182 [3] to describe the use of PSA in risk informed regulation activities. The PSA models developed for the IPEs were typically based on a “snapshot” of the the risk profile at the nuclear power plant. The IPE models contain implicit assumptions and simplifications that limit the ability to realistically assess current issues. For example, IPE modeling assumptions related to plant configuration limit the ability to perform online equipment out-of-service assessments. The lack of model symmetry results in skewed risk results. IPE model simplifications related to initiating events have resulted in non-conservative estimates of risk impacts when equipment is removed from service. The IPE models also do not explicitly address all external events that are potentially risk significant as equipment is removed from service.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.