Abstract

The design of plant tissue culture media remains a complicated task due to the interactions of many factors. The use of computer-based tools is still very scarce, although they have demonstrated great advantages when used in large dataset analysis. In this study, design of experiments (DOE) and three machine learning (ML) algorithms, artificial neural networks (ANNs), fuzzy logic, and genetic algorithms (GA), were combined to decipher the key minerals and predict the optimal combination of salts for hardy kiwi (Actinidia arguta) in vitro micropropagation. A five-factor experimental design of 33 salt treatments was defined using DOE. Later, the effect of the ionic variations generated by these five factors on three morpho-physiological growth responses – shoot number (SN), shoot length (SL), and leaves area (LA) – and on three quality responses - shoots quality (SQ), basal callus (BC), and hyperhydricity (H) – were modeled and analyzed simultaneously. Neurofuzzy logic models demonstrated that just 11 ions (five macronutrients (N, K, P, Mg, and S) and six micronutrients (Cl, Fe, B, Mo, Na, and I)) out of the 18 tested explained the results obtained. The rules “IF – THEN” allow for easy deduction of the concentration range of each ion that causes a positive effect on growth responses and guarantees healthy shoots. Secondly, using a combination of ANNs-GA, a new optimized medium was designed and the desired values for each response parameter were accurately predicted. Finally, the experimental validation of the model showed that the optimized medium significantly promotes SQ and reduces BC and H compared to standard media generally used in plant tissue culture. This study demonstrated the suitability of computer-based tools for improving plant in vitro micropropagation: (i) DOE to design more efficient experiments, saving time and cost; (ii) ANNs combined with fuzzy logic to understand the cause-effect of several factors on the response parameters; and (iii) ANNs-GA to predict new mineral media formulation, which improve growth response, avoiding morpho-physiological abnormalities. The lack of predictability on some response parameters can be due to other key media components, such as vitamins, PGRs, or organic compounds, particularly glycine, which could modulate the effect of the ions and needs further research for confirmation.

Highlights

  • The process of designing protocols for successful plant tissue culture is a very complex task, since there are many potential interacting factors in this process (Figure 1)

  • The inorganic nutrients added into the plant tissue culture media can be differentiated in two groups (Figure 1): macronutrients, taken up in large amounts (>0.5 medium ion composition (mM) L−1) including nitrogen (N), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), magnesium (Mg) and sulfur (S); and those used in small quantities or micronutrients (

  • artificial neural networks (ANNs) are powerful machine learning (ML) tools for plant tissue researchers, when they are combined with other techniques that help in the interpretation of results or the use of the models (Gago et al, 2010b; Gallego et al, 2011)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The process of designing protocols for successful plant tissue culture is a very complex task, since there are many potential interacting factors in this process (Figure 1). Achieving quality products during in vitro plant tissue culture, rather than low survival rates and/or occurrence of physiological disorders, is highly dependent on the mineral nutritional composition of the media, as they are essential for optimal morphogenesis and organogenesis (Ramage and Williams, 2002; George et al, 2008; Sonnewald, 2013). Physiological disorders and/or toxicity due to their deficiency or excess in the culture media inorganic composition has been reported (Bresinsky et al, 2013; Nezami-Alanagh et al, 2019). MS mineral composition has been considered as unideal for many fruit species and cultivars (Reed and Hummer, 1995) and even supraoptimal for in vitro culture of kiwifruit Actinidia sp. (Moncaleán et al, 1999, 2003)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call