Abstract
A single-phase, single-stage, differential boost inverter comprises two independently-controlled boost DC-DC converters, with the load connected between their outputs. The net voltage on the load is sinusoidal and has a controllable frequency and magnitude that is larger than that of the DC source. The present work first derives steady-state and small-signal models of the inverter with parasitic elements. The results obtained from the line-to-output transfer function, control-to-output transfer function, open-loop input impedance, and open-loop output impedance models are compared with that of the ones obtained from the experimental testbed. Using the new models, a voltage mode controller is designed in the synchronous reference frame. The regulator design is explored through the use of an example. The results are verified against the small-signal model, then PLECS simulations, and finally a laboratory experiment. The results indicate excellent agreement between the model and experiment during transients in voltage reference, input source voltage, and output load. A sensitivity analysis is performed based on the inverter model considering the parameter variation. Finally, loss and efficiency estimations are provided in this work.
Highlights
Traditional full-bridge inverters are buck type, meaning that the generated output voltage magnitude is lower than that of the DC input voltage
Considering the complexity of this multistage design, a simple single-stage boost inverter was first proposed by Cáceres and Barbi [2]
The single-phase single-stage boost inverter discussed here consists of two DC-DC boost converters
Summary
Traditional full-bridge inverters are buck type, meaning that the generated output voltage magnitude is lower than that of the DC input voltage. To generate an output voltage that is larger in magnitude than the input voltage, an additional boost stage is needed. With the two-stage configuration, the input DC signal is first stepped up using a boost converter and passed through a buck-type full-bridge inverter. The drawbacks of the two stage configuration are discussed in [1]. The efficiency and footprint of the two stage system are not attractive. Considering the complexity of this multistage design, a simple single-stage boost inverter was first proposed by Cáceres and Barbi [2]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.