Abstract

The professional service procurement's plan and process have a major effect on the construction project's success. In the projects of the public sector, the stress between cost and quality is constant. Public authorities are responsible for maximizing value for money while also protecting the quality and performance of the construction project they develop. Issuing the standard bidding documents for consultancy service (SBDCS) was one of many procedures taken by the Iraqi Government represented by the Ministry of Planning to improve the procurement system in Iraq. The SBDCS were designed to acquire high professional services, achieve the economy and efficiency, and give all qualified consultants opportunities to provide service for the Government financed construction projects. In reviewing the reality of SBDCS's application, the inability of the Government's contracting bodies to achieve the desired documents' objectives was observed. Six projects that applied the SBDCS were chosen as case studies in this research. The lack of adequate qualification of the staff assigned to prepare the bidding document was the main reason that hindered the correct application, which led to the delay in the consultants' procurement and contracting process. An evaluation computer program was modeled for the selection of consultants based on the criteria of Iraqi standard bidding documents. The proposed program aims to facilitate the process of consultant selection according to SBDCS.

Highlights

  • A construction Consultancy Services can be defined as an ideological technology based on innovation and knowledge in the field of construction projects' environment

  • The provided information influences the acquisition of qualified consultants in the construction project in the bidding documents

  • The cases study's analysis indicated the importance of terms of reference (TOR) to provide sufficient information for the invited consultants

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A construction Consultancy Services can be defined as an ideological technology based on innovation and knowledge in the field of construction projects' environment. Regardless of the criterion on which the construction contract is awarded, Gransberg [3] found that awarding design consultant contracts to the lowest tender bid causes a condition where the incremental savings in design costs are spent during the construction phase as a result of design deficiencies He concluded that Clients believe that the competence and previous experience of consultant companies with which they work are more important than the project's particulars in determining project progress. (1) Reputation and references & claims from previous contracts (2) Relationships with clients Compliance with demands (3) Service fee and tender price (4) Current commitments (5) Type & size of completed projects (6) Years in business (7) Type companies employed (8) Prior related assignments (9) Firm specialization (10) Total number of technical and administrative staff (11) Key personnel quality and experience (12) Planning capability and achieving objects (13) Equipment and software (14) Cost-effectiveness and value management (15) Number and expertise of management personnel (16) Scheduling and time control (17) Previous project time and cost overruns (18) Amount and duration of insurance (19) Work efficiency and consultant process quality (20) Innovative capabilities (21) Green approach pollution control

Analysis and Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call