Abstract

Abstract Using a general circulation model with newly implemented cloud modeling, we investigate how radiative feedback can self-consistently shape condensate cloud distributions, temperatures, and fluxes in a hot Jupiter atmosphere. We apply a physically motivated but simple parameterization of condensate clouds in which the temperature determines the cloud distribution, and we evaluate how different assumptions of vertical mixing and aerosol opacity affect predictions. We compare results from cases in which the aerosols are simply included in the last step of the simulation (i.e., postprocessed) to cases in which clouds and their radiative feedback are actively included throughout the duration of the simulation. When clouds and radiative feedback were actively included, cloud cover decreased at equatorial regions and increased toward the poles relative to the postprocessed solutions. The resulting phase curves also differed between the two approaches; the postprocessed cloud simulations predicted weaker day–night contrasts in emission and greater eastward shifts in the maximum emission compared to the active cloud modeling. This illustrates the importance of cloud radiative feedback and shows that postprocessing can provide inaccurate solutions when clouds are thick enough to provide significant scattering.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.