Abstract
The impact of vegetation on the hydrology and geomorphology of aquatic ecosystems has been studied intensively in recent years. Numerous hydraulic models developed to date help to understand and quantitatively assess the influence of in-stream macrophytes on a channel’s hydraulic conditions. However, special focus is placed on single-thread rivers, leaving anastomosing rivers practically uninvestigated. To fill this gap, the objective of this study was to investigate the impact of vegetation on flow distribution in a complex anastomosing river system situated in northeastern Poland. The newly designed, one-dimensional, steady-flow model, dedicated for anastomosing rivers used in this study indicated high influence of vegetation on water flow distribution during the whole year in general, but—as expected—significantly higher in the summer season. Simulations of in-stream vegetation removal in selected channels reflected in Manning’s coefficient alterations caused relatively high discharge transitions during the growing season. This proved the significance of feedback between process of plants growth and distribution of flow in anabranches. The results are unique and relevant and could be successfully considered for the protection of semi-natural anabranching rivers.
Highlights
There has been an increasing recognition of the role of vegetation in hydrology and fluvial geomorphology, supported by numerous studies documenting its influence on river channel morphological processes and geomorphic forms [1,2,3]
One of the examples of model-based assessment of vegetation impact on river pattern and morphodynamics was presented by Oorschot et al [10]
The study results indicated that models with dynamic vegetation, compared to static, give a different morphological response of a meandering channel
Summary
There has been an increasing recognition of the role of vegetation in hydrology and fluvial geomorphology, supported by numerous studies documenting its influence on river channel morphological processes and geomorphic forms [1,2,3]. One of the examples of model-based assessment of vegetation impact on river pattern and morphodynamics was presented by Oorschot et al [10]. In their study of a single-channel meandering river, they used a 2D sediment routing model coupled with a dynamic vegetation model. The study results indicated that models with dynamic vegetation, compared to static, give a different morphological response of a meandering channel. The first approach indicated meandering maintenance and the second one a reduction of morphodynamics over time and transformation of the river system into being vegetation-dominated. It stresses the fact that vegetation affects and is affected by morphological processes
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
