Abstract

Robust control models contain unknown perturbations with assumed bounds. Modeling of systems in a robust framework requires a means of estimating such bounds. One can begin to address this problem by studying model validation - is there a perturbation and an unknown disturbance, fitting the assumptions of the model, that accounts for the experimental observation? This paper discusses this problem for systems modeled as members of H <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">∞</sub> or l <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sub> . The assumptions of these design frameworks are significantly different, giving very different implications for the model validation problem. Model validation can also give an approach to parameter identification in robust control models. Again the consequences of the usual assumptions of each framework are discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.