Abstract

The goal of this paper is to explore the model risk inherent in the rating and design of structured finance products. We seek to illustrate the consequences of neglecting state-dependent correlations on the methodologies and criteria employed by the major ratings agencies. In contrast to related studies, we focus exclusively on asymptotic analysis. A variety of tractable asymptotics are derived for “first-generation” securitizations, such as asset-backed securities (ABS), as well as “second-generation” securitizations, such as collateralized debt obligations (CDO) backed by tranches of ABS. Consistent with the recent work of Hull and White [2009], who explore alternative sources of model risk, we find that in the case of first-generation securitizations, the implications are substantial but not catastrophic; in the case of second-generation securitizations, however, the implications are dire. This is due to the fact that our analysis provides a parsimonious description of thin mezzanine tranches as “nearly binary” assets which tend to “go bad” at the same time; a phenomenon which is notably absent in the notorious (and industry standard) Gaussian factor models.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.