Abstract

In this paper, three model predictive current control (MPCC) schemes for permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSM) are studied. The first control scheme is the traditional optimal duty cycle model predictive current control (ODC-MPCC). In this scheme, according to the principle of minimizing the cost function, the optimal voltage vector is selected from the six basic voltage vectors which are optimized simultaneously with the duty, and then, the optimal voltage vector and its duty are applied to the inverter. In order to reduce the computational burden of ODC-MPCC, a second control scheme is proposed. This scheme optimizes the voltage vector control set, reducing the number of candidate voltage vectors from 6 to 2. Finally, according to the principle of minimizing the cost function, the optimal voltage vector is found from the two voltage vectors, and the optimal voltage vector and its duty cycle are applied to the inverter. In addition, in order to further improve the steady-state performance, another vector selection method is introduced. In the combination of voltage vectors, the third control scheme extends the combination of voltage vectors in the second control scheme. The simulation results show that the second control scheme not only reduces the computational burden of the first control scheme but also obtains steady-state performance and dynamic performance equivalent to the first control scheme. The third control scheme obtains better steady-state performance without significantly increasing the computational burden and has dynamic performance comparable to the first and second control schemes.

Highlights

  • The new energy vehicle industry is undergoing rapid development

  • In the combination of voltage vectors, the third control scheme extends the combination of voltage vectors in the second control scheme. e simulation results show that the second control scheme reduces the computational burden of the first control scheme and obtains steady-state performance and dynamic performance equivalent to the first control scheme. e third control scheme obtains better steady-state performance without significantly increasing the computational burden and has dynamic performance comparable to the first and second control schemes

  • Electric vehicles (EVs) require frequent start and stop under working conditions and require good steady-state performance at high speeds. e permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSM) has the characteristics of small size, lightweight, good reliability, and large torque when running at medium and low speeds, it can carry out weak magnetic acceleration and low noise [1, 2]. erefore, the PMSM is the best choice as the drive motor for EVs. e control performance and reliability of PMSM will affect the working status of related equipment and affect the economic benefits of the entire industry. erefore, it is important to study the high-performance control strategy driven by PMSM [3]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The new energy vehicle industry is undergoing rapid development. Electric vehicles (EVs) require frequent start and stop under working conditions and require good steady-state performance at high speeds. e PMSM has the characteristics of small size, lightweight, good reliability, and large torque when running at medium and low speeds, it can carry out weak magnetic acceleration and low noise [1, 2]. erefore, the PMSM is the best choice as the drive motor for EVs. e control performance and reliability of PMSM will affect the working status of related equipment and affect the economic benefits of the entire industry. erefore, it is important to study the high-performance control strategy driven by PMSM [3]. E abundant voltage vector combination makes the voltage vector have a wider selection range, and the steadystate performance is improved; at the same time, the computational burden is increased. In order to obtain better steady-state performance and reduce the computational burden of the algorithm, literature [20] by calculating the q-axis current slopes for different voltage vector and finding the optimal intersection point. Aiming at the problem that the optimal duty cycle control (ODC-MPCC) is performed 6 times in total, the calculation burden of current prediction is heavy. Discrete Mathematical Model of PMSM e voltage equation of surface-mounted PMSM in the synchronous d-q reference frame is as follows: uq

Ls did dt
Sequence number difference
Findings
The optimal voltage vector combination and its duration topt uopt
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call