Abstract

The purpose of the paper is development of a conceptual model for the representation of knowledge as an active intellectual substance and, on this basis, study of metaphysics of knowledge transformation process being produced both individually and collectively in the practice of organizations. The first principle of knowledge engineering, as Edward Albert Feigenbaum noted, says that the power in solving problems that an intellectual subject (person or machine) manifests in the process of activity depends primarily on its knowledge base, and only secondly on the methods of inference used. Strength is hidden in knowledge. The process of producing knowledge is permanent and does not depend on whether an individual is going to use this knowledge or not. Knowledge constantly produces new knowledge regardless of the owner's desire. Besides that, knowledge can’t arise from nothing, but always – from some knowledge obtained earlier. As well as the intelligence, knowledge is an emergent instance arising from the collective interaction of a lot of intellectual atomic elements of knowledge (knowledge quanta). Idiosyncrasy of this interaction is expressed precisely in the creation of new knowledge. Due to postulating the knowledge self-organizing, the hierarchical knowledge structures in memory and the process of thinking as a kind of syntax for the procedure of new knowledge generation are described. This is an effort towards understanding the memory mechanisms, the process of thinking, the sources of heuristic knowledge just through the inner nature of knowledge. Also, based on the knowledge self-organization principle, an archetype of the appropriate knowledge-based system architecture is presented too. As an implementation of the concept, the perceptual act model is described, and on its base, a possible scenario for the behavior of a robot meeting an obstacle in its path is considered. As the mutual transformation of tacit and explicit knowledge makes new knowledge, the impact of the self-organization of knowledge on the transformation process as well as conditions of self-organization of both individual knowledge and organizational knowledge are analyzed in detail. Finally, modification of the known model of knowledge dimensions by Nonaka and Takeuchi is proposed. Because of the native activity of knowledge, it is impossible to build a knowledge management system without considering the internal structure of knowledge and its emergent ability to self-organize. Ensuring the natural process of knowledge development at all ontological levels in an organization is an essential prerequisite for the evolution of values in this organization.

Highlights

  • The root issues of knowledge management (KM) are closely related to the fundamental problems of artificial intelligence

  • It should be noted that “full-stack” developing KM framework includes a set of tasks having to be decided: development of a knowledge representation model, clarifying the metaphysics of transformation process of both individual and collective knowledge, development of methods for structuring knowledge, forming requirements for the formalism of representation and manipulation of knowledge and the choice of an appropriate programming system that implements this formalism, creating a workflow infrastructure

  • A conceptual model of knowledge representation as an active intellectual substance, which has emergent self-organization property resulted from the idiosyncrasy of collective interaction of atomic structural elements, is developed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The root issues of knowledge management (KM) are closely related to the fundamental problems of artificial intelligence. The awareness of artificial intelligence is considered in parallel with the problem of determining intelligence in general Since such a definition does not exist so far, the natural question arises – why? This approach is a manifestation of classical rationalism and has been repeatedly criticized, symbolic systems dominate in studies of artificial intelligence up to nowadays This criticism is a representation based on common sense, according to which the world around us is inherently more irrational than rational. The problem of knowledge representation, knowledges emergence, development and transfer will be the key one for any approach to artificial intelligence modelling. Postulating the intellect as an emergent means of collective adaptation in the environment, this problem can be formulated as follows: is it possible to accumulate knowledge and manipulate them in the same way as community intelligent beings do? Postulating the intellect as an emergent means of collective adaptation in the environment, this problem can be formulated as follows: is it possible to accumulate knowledge and manipulate them in the same way as community intelligent beings do? In the article, we intend to consider two key moments in the context: knowledge representation model and metaphysics of the transformation of knowledge collectively produced and used in people's practice

Artificial Intelligence Techniques
Knowledge Representation Models
Knowledge Management
Extracting Knowledge from Data
Quanta and Clusters of Knowledge
Knowledge Quanta and Thinking
Self-organization of Knowledge
Model of Behavioral Act
Explicit and Tacit Knowledge
Formalization of Organizational Knowledge
Process of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Findings
Discussion and Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.