Abstract

Numerical weather prediction (NWP) models have been increasing in skill and their capability to simulate weather systems and provide valuable information at convective scales has improved in recent years. Much effort has been put into developing NWP models across the globe. Representation of physical processes is one of the critical issues in NWP, and it differs from one model to another. We investigated the performance of three regional NWP models used by the South African Weather Service over southern Africa, to identify the model that produces the best deterministic forecasts for the study domain. The three models – Unified Model (UM), Consortium for Small-scale Modelling (COSMO) and Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) – were run at a horizontal grid spacing of about 4.4 km. Model forecasts for precipitation, 2-m temperature, and wind speed were verified against different observations. Snow was evaluated against reported snow records. Both the temporal and spatial verification of the model forecasts showed that the three models are comparable, with slight variations. Temperature and wind speed forecasts were similar for the three different models. Accumulated precipitation was mostly similar, except where WRF captured small rainfall amounts from a coastal low, while it over-estimated rainfall over the ocean. The UM showed a bubble-like shape towards the tropics, while COSMO cut-off part of the rainfall band that extended from the tropics to the sub-tropics. The COSMO and WRF models simulated a larger spatial coverage of precipitation than UM and snow-report records.Significance: Extreme weather events, such as tornadoes, floods, strong winds and heat waves, have significant impacts on society, the economy, infrastructure, agriculture and many other sectors. These impacts may be mitigated or even prevented through early warning systems which depend on the use of weather forecasts and information from NWP models. As South Africa depends on models from developed countries, these models may have shortcomings in capturing extreme weather events over the southern African region.

Highlights

  • Weather and climate impact everyday life, while extreme events can cause loss of life and injuries as well as damage to property

  • Numerical weather prediction (NWP) models are based on the laws of physics that govern atmospheric dynamics and thermodynamics, and they use observations as inputs to forecast the future state of the atmosphere.[1,2,3]

  • We investigated the performance of three NWP models – namely the Unified Model (UM), Consortium for Smallscale Modelling model (COSMO) and Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) – over southern Africa to identify the model that produces the best forecasts for the study domain

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Weather and climate impact everyday life, while extreme events can cause loss of life and injuries as well as damage to property. Since 2016, the South African Weather Service (SAWS) has been using subsets from the 10-km global UM, and operationally running the UM at two convection-permitting resolutions, namely 4.4 km and 1.5 km.[22] Stein et al.[22] compared the three configurations in order to examine the benefits of increasing model resolution for forecasting convection over southern Africa They identified benefits in using convection-permitting models in the timing of the diurnal cycle and precipitation amounts. Understanding the quality (reliability, accuracy, skill, sharpness and uncertainty) of model forecasts is useful for gaining insight into the strengths and weaknesses of the model, for model users, decision-makers and model developers.[60] For the purpose of this study, several weather variables were selected for verifying the models and evaluating their performance against different observations, namely, wind speed, surface temperature, total precipitation and accumulated snow. These model forecasts are displayed along with the corresponding observations for eye-ball verification over the South African domain

Objective verification
Results
Discussions and conclusions
11. Offenbach
69. De Bilt
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call