Abstract
ABSTRACT Real-world market quotes of bonds can sometimes contradict the no arbitrage principle within the discounted cash flow model. This makes some kinds of no-arbitrage-based analyses impossible, e.g., inferring the bounds for the term structure of interest rates. Instead of using a more sophisticated model to account for pricing peculiarities, we propose a replacement for the no arbitrage principle. While being theoretically plausible, it does not get contradicted by the data – thus, we can infer the same kind of term structure bounds from it, even given the contradictions with the no arbitrage principle. Using a dataset of Russian sovereign bond quotes, we show that the no arbitrage inconsistency problem arises in 10–20% of cases and that the proposed approach successfully overcomes it.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.