Abstract

Problem statement: Actuarial science has grown much popularity in the recent years due to the growth of insurance companies. In practice, the data involved in actuarial science are mostly counts which may be over-,equi-or under-dispersed. Many probability distributions were proposed to model such data such as the mixed Poisson distributions. However, the estimation methodologies based on such mixed Poisson distributions may be complicated and may not yield consistent and efficient estimates. Approach: In this study, we consider a recently introduced model known as the two-parameter Com-Poisson distribution that is flexible in modeling both over-,equi-and under-dispersed data. Results: The estimation of parameters is carried out using a quasi-likelihood estimation technique based on a joint estimation approach and a marginal approach via Newton-Raphson iterative procedure. Conclusion: The Com-Poisson distribution is applied on two samples of insurance data and we compare the estimates with the estimates based on the Negative-Lindley distribution. Based on the results, it is shown that both Com-Poisson and Negative Lindley yield almost equally efficient estimates of the parameters with fitted values almost close to the actual values under both the joint and marginal quasi-likelihood approaches.

Highlights

  • The modeling of count data is one of the most important issues in actuarial theory

  • We provide an overview of the Com-Poisson model and discuss its statistical properties

  • The elements in Vi are derived iteratively from the (4) moment generating function of yit which is given by: To estimate the parameters λ and ν, we consider the Quasi-likelihood Equation (QLE) developed by Wedderburn (1974). We extend his approach and review the joint quasi-likelihood estimating equations and develop marginal quasi-likelihood estimating equations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Various probability distributions have been proposed to model these data but the fundamental question is which model yields the best fits. These distributions comprise of the Poisson distribution, the negative binomial distribution, the Generalized Poisson distribution and mixed distributions (Johnson et al, 1993). The Generalized Poisson distribution may not be suitable when the data is underdispersed (Jahangeer et al, 2009) To overcome these problems, Shmueli et al (2005) have recently reintroduced a discrete model known as Com-Poisson. This model has the ability to account for over-, equiand under-dispersion irrespective of the type of dispersion of the count data. We compare the fits based on the Com-Poisson model with the fits based on the Negative-Lindley distribution (Zamani and Ismail, 2010)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call