Abstract

The paper is drawn from the authors' experience in teaching general and generalized linear fixed effects models at the university level. The steps followed include model specification, model estimation, and hypothesis testing in general linear model setting. Among these steps, estimation of model parameters such as the main effect least squares means and contrasts were among the most challenging for students. Since no unique solution exists, students are first exposed to the equivalence between two popular techniques that an over-parameterized model can be subjected to in order to obtain the parameter estimates. This is particularly important because existing software do not necessarily follow the same path to produce an Analysis of Variance (or Covariance) of the general, generalized linear fixed or mixed effects models. These steps are generally hidden from the users. It is therefore crucial for the students to understand the intermediary processes that ultimately produce the same results regardless of the software one uses. The equivalent techniques, the set-to-zero and sum-to-zero restrictions, used to obtain solution of the normal equations of the fixed effects model, are presented. The relationship between them is also presented and in the process, data analysis makes use of two important concepts: the generalized inverse and estimable function. The invariance property of estimable functions is also explained in details in addition to the extra sum of squares principle which is introduced to supplement the other concepts. To exemplify these ideas and put them in practice, a simple one-way treatment structure analysis of variance is performed.

Highlights

  • The study is drawn from the authors’ experience in teaching general and generalized linear fixed effects models at the university/polytechnic levels

  • Since no unique solution exists, students are first exposed to the equivalence between two popular techniques that an over-parameterized model can be subjected to in order to obtain the parameter estimates

  • This is important because existing software do not necessarily follow the same path to produce an Analysis of Variance of the general, generalized linear fixed or mixed effects models

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The study is drawn from the authors’ experience in teaching general and generalized linear fixed effects models at the university/polytechnic levels. Since no unique solution exists, students are first introduced to the equivalence between two popular techniques namely, over-parameterized model so as to obtain the parameter estimates This is important because existing software do not necessarily follow the same path to produce an Analysis of Variance (or Covariance) of the general, generalized linear fixed or mixed effects models. The use of general linear model is motivated by the desire to determine of how and to what degree variation in the dependent is related to the relevant fixed effects (the random effects are not treated in this study) These effects are reflected in the right hand side of (1) and in the set up of the X matrix implied by the treatment structure

Estimation Methods
Ilustrative Example
Set-to-Zero Restrictions
Sum-of-Zero Restrictions
Estimable Functions
Conversion From Sum-Restrictions to Set-to-Zero
Cell Means Model
Special Cases of the General Linear Model
Principle of Conditional Error or Extra-Sum of Squares
Alternative Formulations to Extra Sum of Squares
Goodness-of-Fit Using Likelihood Ratio Test
4.10 Additional Resources
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call