Abstract

We present an approach for the verification of Erlang programs using abstract interpretation and model checking. In previous work we defined a framework for abstract interpretations for Erlang. In this framework it is guaranteed, that the abstract operational semantics preserves all paths of the standard operational semantics. We consider properties that have to hold on all paths of a system, like properties in LTL. If these properties can be proven for the abstract operational semantics, then they also hold for the Erlang program. The proof can be automated with model checking if the abstract operational semantics is a finite transition system. But finiteness cannot be guaranteed because of non-tail recursive function calls. Even for finite domain abstract interpretations we get infinite state systems and model checking is undecidable. In this paper we define an abstraction of the control–flow. It replaces recursive calls in non–tail positions by jumps to the last call of the same function. The corresponding returns are replace by jumps to the possible return points.We have implemented this approach as a prototype and are able to prove properties like mutual exclusion or the absence of deadlocks and lifelocks for some Erlang programs.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.