Abstract

Fault localization techniques reduce the effort required when debugging software, as revealed by previous test cases. However, many test cases are required to reduce the number of candidate fault locations. To overcome this disadvantage, various methods were proposed to reduce fault-localization costs by prioritizing test cases. However, because a sufficient number of test cases is required for prioritization, the test-case generation cost remains high. This paper proposes a test-case generation method using a state chart to reduce the number of test suites required for fault localization, minimizing the test-case generation and execution times. The test-suite generation process features two phases: fault-detection test-case generation and fault localization in the test cases. Each phase uses mutation analysis to evaluate test cases; the results are employed to improve the test cases according to the objectives of each phase, using genetic algorithms. We provide useful guidelines for application of a search-based mutational method to a state chart; we show that the proposed method improves fault-localization performance in the test-suite generation phase.

Highlights

  • Testing is gradually becoming a more important part of software development as the complexity of software increases

  • This paper introduces application of the fault-localization technique to the test-generation phase to aid in the creation of test suites for fault localization

  • The method proposed in this study aims to improve the test suites so that fault localization is possible using a small number of test suites

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Testing is gradually becoming a more important part of software development as the complexity of software increases. Significant amounts of time and manpower are required to conduct tests manually; automated testing is considered essential. Model-based testing (MBT) is one of several methods for generating test data [1]. This is a process used in the model-based development method and employs the models generated by this method to specify test suites and reduce the time required for testing. Unified-modeling-language (UML) state charts, which are an extension of FSMs, are among the most frequently used MBT techniques [2,3]. Tests that use UML state charts or FSM can use state and transition coverage [4,5] to verify whether all states and transitions in the model are visited. If a higher level of testing is desired, all of the transition pairs [6,7,8] can be considered

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.