Abstract
The increase in minimum flows has rarely been considered to mitigate the ecological impact of hydroelectric power plants because it requires a site-specific design and expensive long-term monitoring procedure to identify the most beneficial scenario. This study presents a model-based method to estimate, within the model constraints, the most sustainable scenario of water resource sharing between nature and human needs. We studied physical habitat suitability of the Isar River in Munich (Germany) for three protected fish species: Thymallus thymallus L., Hucho hucho L., and Chondostroma nasus L. The analysis combined a high-resolution two-dimensional (2D) hydromorphological model with expert-based procedures using Computer Aided Simulation Model for Instream Flow Requirements (CASiMIR). We simulated a range of minimum discharges from 5 to 68.5 m³/s and four scenarios: (A) maximum use of the resource for humans; (B) slight increase in the minimum water flow; (C) medium increase in the minimum water flow; and, (D) without diversion for hydroelectric production. Under the current hydromorphological conditions, model outputs showed that different life stages of the fish species showed preferences for different scenarios, and that none of the four scenarios provided permanently suitable habitat conditions for the three species. We suggest that discharge management should be combined with hydromorphological restoration actions to re-establish parts of the modified channel slope and/or parts of the previously lost floodplain habitat in order to implement a solution that favors all species at the same time. The modeling procedure that is presented may be helpful to identify the discharge scenario that is most efficient for maintaining target fish species under realistic usage conditions.
Highlights
Demands for renewable energy production, e.g., hydroelectric power plants, increase, but their ecological impact remains considerable
The proportion of suitable habitats for Adults (HHA, CNAW, CNAS, and TTA) generally increased with discharge (Figure 4a), but for T. thymallus (TTA) they decreased at discharges above 17 m3 /s
Spawning habitats (HHJS, TTS, and CNS) benefited from a slight increase in discharge, but habitat suitability decreased for T. thymallus (TTS) and remained stable for H. hucho (HHJS) at medium to high discharges (Figure 4c)
Summary
Demands for renewable energy production, e.g., hydroelectric power plants, increase, but their ecological impact remains considerable. Hydropower is one of the two largest contributors to sustainable electricity generation worldwide and represented almost 80% of the electricity generated using renewable resources in 2012 [3] It is the most affordable renewable energy source, and run-of-river hydroelectric power plants have the highest energy payback ratio (267 versus 39 for wind and nine for solar photovoltaic) [4]. They contribute greatly to the degradation of river ecosystems and biodiversity [5,6]: Retention structures are obstacles to the longitudinal connectivity of river habitats [7], reduce hydrodynamics, and foster exotic species invasion [8]; hydropeaking causes dewatering, fish stranding and modifies fish assemblage [9,10]; flow modifications have severe consequences for river ecosystems [8], and for the fish population [11,12,13,14,15].
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
