Abstract

This paper presents a modification of the modal-based ground motion selection (MGMS) method for improving the reliability of the nonlinear response time history analysis (NLRHA) of reinforced concrete (RC) shear wall structures. The original MGMS procedure quantified the impact of frequency content combinations in the time domain (FCCTD) of input ground motions (IGMs) on the seismic response of building structures using the level of interaction of the first three modes induced by IGMs. However, previous research found that the first two modes have far larger modal mass coefficients than those of higher modes and dominate the vibration of the RC shear wall structures with a symmetric plan. Therefore, the MGMS procedure should be modified by employing the interaction of the first two modes induced by IGMs to properly account for the effect of the FCCTD of IGMs on the seismic response of structures. In the MGMS procedure for RC shear wall structures, seven IGMs that caused the most significant interactions of the first two modes were selected from a suite of twenty seed IGMs, which were chosen with a conventional spectra-matching-based IGMs selection procedure for the NLRHA of the structure. A comprehensive case study involving three RC shear walls with different heights was conducted to investigate the capability of the MGMS in selecting suitable IGMs for the NLRHA of RC shear wall structures. Sets of seed IGMs were selected, adopting conditional mean spectra and design spectra as the target spectra. It was found that the seismic demands computed using MGMS selected IGMs can ensure a more reliable and reasonable computation of seismic demands compared with conventional spectra-matching-based IGMs selection methods.

Highlights

  • Tall buildings in moderate and high seismicity regions extensively adopt reinforced concrete (RC) shear wall structures to resist lateral loads because of their remarkable seismic performance

  • The original modal-based ground motion selection (MGMS) procedure that does not take modal response characteristics of the RC shear wall structures into account selected seven input ground motions (IGMs) that caused the most significant interaction of the first three modes for the nonlinear response time history analysis (NLRHA) of the shear wall structures following the procedure in Reference [30]

  • This paper presents a modification on the modal-based ground motion selection (MGMS) procedure for more proper consideration of the modal response characteristics of the RC shear wall structures in the input ground motions (IGMs) selection procedure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tall buildings in moderate and high seismicity regions extensively adopt reinforced concrete (RC) shear wall structures to resist lateral loads because of their remarkable seismic performance. Driven by the need to take the effect of FCCTD of IGMs on the structural seismic demand into account in the selection of IGMs and improve the reliability of NLRHA, the modal-based ground motion selection (MGMS) procedure [30] was developed. Considering the effect of IGMs on the interaction of the first two dominated modes is more reasonable in selecting IGMs for the NLRHA of RC shear walls with a symmetric plan. The higher-order mode effect will be exaggerated in the IGM selection, and the reliability of the NLRHA of shear wall structures will be affected. Accounting for the domination of the first two modes in the vibration of the RC shear wall structures, the MGMS procedure was modified by considering the first two modes’ interaction in the IGMs selection. Future studies should consider alternative approaches proposed in the literature for modelling the viscous damping of the structure and investigate the effect of modelling damping on record-to-record variabilities

Characteristics of the Seed IGMs
IGM Selection for the NLRHA of RC Shear Wall Structures
Comparison of the Results of MGMS Procedures
Comparison of Seismic Demands by Different IGM Selection Procedures
Comparison of the Deviation of the Computed Demands
Conclusions
90 N 90 E NSE NS9900 NSNS ENS ENS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call