Modal effects of span-layout types on coupled flutter of long-span suspension bridges

Abstract

This study provides a theoretical explanation for a perplexing experimental phenomenon observed frequently in suspension bridge flutter testing, where the flutter critical wind speed (Ucr) predicted by two-dimensional (2D) section model testing is higher than that predicted by three-dimensional (3D) full aeroelastic model testing. Six long-span suspension bridges with either a single simply supported span or multiple continuously supported spans were taken as research examples, then the comparative studies on the flutter critical wind speeds, flutter frequencies, modal energy ratios and aerodynamic damping corresponding to 2D and 3D coupled flutter states were carried out to illustrate the flutter modal effects. The research findings indicate that the Ucr of 2D testing being higher than that of 3D testing is an inherent characteristic for single-span simply-supported suspension bridges, which can be attributed to the prominent aerodynamic negative damping associated with 2nd-order vertical bending mode. However, due to the aerodynamic positive damping associated with 3rd-order vertical bending mode, the Ucr of 2D testing is consistently lower than that of 3D testing in the cases of multi-spans continuously-supported suspension bridges. Additionally, to eliminate unsafe 2D evaluations, a reasonable modal matching principle is recommended for section model testing of single-span simply-supported suspension bridges.