Abstract
In the month approaching the 2014 Scottish Independence referendum, we tested the Identity‐Deprivation‐Efficacy‐Action‐Subjective Well‐Being model using an electorally representative survey of Scottish adults (N = 1,156) to predict voting for independence and subjective well‐being. Based on social identity theory, we hypothesized for voting intention that the effects of collective relative deprivation, group identification, and collective efficacy, but not personal relative deprivation (PRD), should be fully mediated by social change ideology. Well‐being was predicted to be associated with PRD (negatively) and group identification (positively and, indirectly, negatively). Unaffected by demographic variables and differences in political interest, nested structural equation model tests supported the model, accounting for 82% of the variance in voting intention and 31% of the variance in subjective well‐being. However, effects involving efficacy depended on its temporal framing. We consider different ways that social identification can simultaneously enhance and diminish well‐being and we discuss ramifications of the model for collective mobilization and separatist nationalism. Findings also suggest new directions for research on social identity, collective efficacy, and collective action.
Highlights
Mobilizing Identity-Deprivation-Efficacy-Action-Subjective WellBeing (IDEAS) in the Scottish Referendum: Predicting voting intention and well-being with the Identity-Deprivation-Efficacy-Action-Subjective well-being model
Based on social identity theory, we hypothesized for voting intention that the effects of collective relative deprivation, group identification, and collective efficacy, but not personal relative deprivation (PRD), should be fully mediated by social change ideology
This builds on recent theoretical advances in the field of intergroup relations that aim to combine ideas from relative deprivation theory, social identity theory, and resource mobilization theory to explain collective actions taken by members of disadvantaged groups who feel that their group is being treated unfairly (e.g., Becker & Tausch, 2015; Sturmer & Simon, 2004; van Zomeren, Leach, & Spears, 2012; van Zomeren, et al, 2008)
Summary
Mobilizing IDEAS in the Scottish Referendum: Predicting voting intention and well-being with the Identity-Deprivation-Efficacy-Action-Subjective well-being model. In the month approaching the 2014 Scottish Independence referendum, we tested the Identity-Deprivation-Efficacy-Action-Subjective Well-Being model using an electorally representative survey of Scottish adults (N = 1,156) to predict voting for independence and subjective well-being. We extend previous conceptualizations in a more comprehensive Identity-Deprivation-Efficacy-Action-Subjective WellBeing (IDEAS) model This builds on recent theoretical advances in the field of intergroup relations that aim to combine ideas from relative deprivation theory, social identity theory, and resource mobilization theory to explain collective actions taken by members of disadvantaged groups who feel that their group is being treated unfairly (e.g., Becker & Tausch, 2015; Sturmer & Simon, 2004; van Zomeren, Leach, & Spears, 2012; van Zomeren, et al, 2008).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
