Mobilizing for Change in a Social Movement Society

Abstract

VERTA TAYLOR Ohio State University consequences for sexual freedom should certainly ensure more of it. Of course, this is exactly what the Christian right and more other Orthodox religions are afraid of; but as I see it, failing another epidemiological disaster, the forward motion is toward sexual freedom and pleasure. This may mean more destabilization of marriage if sexuality is unsatisfying in the relationship, and more permission to use sexuality as a major bond in relationships where sexuality is fulfilling. Nonmonogamy may be more common, but not necessarily as much of an absolute trespass (la the European model). In the twentyfirst century, sex will be more of an appetite and less of a moral crisis. And the good news here is that, ultimately, such a change may make us more humane in our interpersonal relations and more just in our social programs and legal institutions. Sexual health can become part of a rational public health program, and not a political hot potato. At least this is the twenty-first century I would like to live in.