Abstract

Abstract. Mobility particle size spectrometers often referred to as DMPS (Differential Mobility Particle Sizers) or SMPS (Scanning Mobility Particle Sizers) have found a wide range of applications in atmospheric aerosol research. However, comparability of measurements conducted world-wide is hampered by lack of generally accepted technical standards and guidelines with respect to the instrumental set-up, measurement mode, data evaluation as well as quality control. Technical standards were developed for a minimum requirement of mobility size spectrometry to perform long-term atmospheric aerosol measurements. Technical recommendations include continuous monitoring of flow rates, temperature, pressure, and relative humidity for the sheath and sample air in the differential mobility analyzer. We compared commercial and custom-made inversion routines to calculate the particle number size distributions from the measured electrical mobility distribution. All inversion routines are comparable within few per cent uncertainty for a given set of raw data. Furthermore, this work summarizes the results from several instrument intercomparison workshops conducted within the European infrastructure project EUSAAR (European Supersites for Atmospheric Aerosol Research) and ACTRIS (Aerosols, Clouds, and Trace gases Research InfraStructure Network) to determine present uncertainties especially of custom-built mobility particle size spectrometers. Under controlled laboratory conditions, the particle number size distributions from 20 to 200 nm determined by mobility particle size spectrometers of different design are within an uncertainty range of around ±10% after correcting internal particle losses, while below and above this size range the discrepancies increased. For particles larger than 200 nm, the uncertainty range increased to 30%, which could not be explained. The network reference mobility spectrometers with identical design agreed within ±4% in the peak particle number concentration when all settings were done carefully. The consistency of these reference instruments to the total particle number concentration was demonstrated to be less than 5%. Additionally, a new data structure for particle number size distributions was introduced to store and disseminate the data at EMEP (European Monitoring and Evaluation Program). This structure contains three levels: raw data, processed data, and final particle size distributions. Importantly, we recommend reporting raw measurements including all relevant instrument parameters as well as a complete documentation on all data transformation and correction steps. These technical and data structure standards aim to enhance the quality of long-term size distribution measurements, their comparability between different networks and sites, and their transparency and traceability back to raw data.

Highlights

  • Over the past 10–15 yr, mobility size particle spectrometers have been increasingly used for long-term observations of atmospheric particle number size distributions in the submicrometer diameter range

  • Within the EUSAAR and ACTRIS projects, we developed technical standards for mobility particle size spectrometers

  • When dual mobility particle size spectrometers such as a TDMPS (Twin Differential Mobility Particle Sizer) are used to encompass a wider particle size range, the relative humidity (RH) parameters should be separately reported for each differential mobility analyzer (DMA)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the past 10–15 yr, mobility size particle spectrometers have been increasingly used for long-term observations of atmospheric particle number size distributions in the submicrometer diameter range. Helsper et al (2008) published the results from a VDI-initiated study (“Verein Deutscher Ingenieure”, The Association of German Engineers), which compared four commercial mobility particle size spectrometers (TSI long-SMPS, TSI nano-SMPS and two Grimm-SMPS) and a custom-made IFT-TDMPS (Twin-DMPS; based on Birmili et al, 1999). An additional goal is that our recommendations should be adapted for commercial mobility particle size spectrometers in the future The experiments of these investigations were performed within the frame of the European research infrastructure projects EUSAAR and ACTRIS, the network of Excellence ACCENT (Atmospheric Composition Change: a European Network), the WMOGAW programme (Global Atmosphere Watch), and EMEP (European Monitoring and Evaluation Program)

The principles of mobility particle size spectrometers
Harmonization of the technical standard
Technical features of the mobility particle size spectrometers
Sheath air flow circuit specifications
Aerosol and sheath air flow measurement
Temperature and pressure
Correction of particle losses
Plumbing
Bipolar diffusion charger
Differential mobility analyzer
Condensation particle counter
Inversion routines
Sizing accuracy using PSL particles
Traceability of mobility particle size spectrometer
Summary
Level-0
Level-1
Level-2
Constants and relevant equations
Findings
EUSAAR format
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call