Abstract

Abstract Gas injection is a proven enhanced oil recovery method, especially for light oil reservoirs. The primary objective of gas injection is to improve the displacement efficiency and reduce residual oil saturation below the values usually obtained in waterflooding. However, the macroscopic sweep efficiency of gas injection can be suboptimal, mainly due to channelling, viscous fingering and gravity segregation of the injected gas. The macroscopic sweep of gas injection is further reduced for highly heterogeneous reservoirs. In this paper we examine the ability of both foam and polymer to provide mobility control to gas injection in a mixed-wet carbonate reservoir with high permeability contrast, i.e, high permeability zone on top of a low permeability zone. Under waterflood, there is an impediment for water to flow from the high permeable Upper zone to the Lower zone due to e.g., capillary pressure. The paper presents two new emerging technologies for mobility control of gas injection, which results in improving vertical sweep efficiency of oil reservoirs, namely: 1-SIMGAP: Simultaneous injection of miscible gas in the low permeable Lower zone and a polymer solution in the high permeable Upper zone. A lateral pressure gradient is maintained in the Upper zone by the injected polymer, providing Lower zone gas confinement; and2-Foam: Simultaneous injection of surfactant solution in the Upper zone and gas in the Lower zone. As gas migrates to the Upper zone, foam will be created in-situ and reduces both gas and water mobility in the Upper zone. This leads to the containment of the gas in the Lower zone, thus improving vertical sweep of the reservoir. The EOR processes are compared based on recovery factor, possibility of success, robustness to geological heterogeneity and operating conditions and stability at high temperature and salinity conditions. Simulation results show that the two EOR processes have the potential of recovering the oil that is by-passed by waterflood or conventional gas injection schemes. The SIMGAP process (polymer based) leads to higher recovery factor than the foam process. Experimental data supporting simulation work was also conducted as part of this study.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call