Abstract
Jutai J, Coulson S, Teasell R, Bayley M, Garland J, Mayo N, Wood-Dauphinee S. Mobility assistive device utilization in a prospective study of patients with first-ever stroke. Objective To estimate the extent to which clinical and functional features of stroke were related to the use of mobility assistive technology devices. Design Longitudinal study of quality of life after stroke. Setting Hospitals, rehabilitation centers, and universities in Ontario and Quebec. Participants Subjects (N=316) with confirmed initial stroke were included in this analysis. Fifty-eight percent of the overall sample were men (n=184). The mean age of this sample at the time of the stroke ± standard deviation was 65.3±15.3 years (range, 19–96y). One hundred thirty-five patients received a mobility assistive device poststroke, and 181 did not. Intervention Assistive devices for mobility (canes, walkers, wheelchairs). Main Outcome Measures Assistive device use and mobility capacity. Results Mobility device nonusers were less physically disabled than device users on a variety of measures. Poor physical functioning but good cognition were reliably associated with mobility device use. Use of multiple mobility assistive devices was more often associated with poorer physical functioning than was single device use. For single device users, wheelchair use was predicted by cognition, functional independence, and stroke recovery. Cane users, compared with walker users, had better mobility and were less physically impaired by stroke. Conclusions Patients were well matched to device type based on their mobility capacity. The findings of this study suggest that assistive device prescription-outcome relationships in stroke can be effectively and meaningfully modeled.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.