Abstract
The article analyses the effectiveness of the use of such an institution of electoral law as a mobile voter (voter voting by location, not by place of residence or place of stay) during the presidential elections of the Russian Federation on March 18, 2018 in comparison with the use of the institution of issuing absentee certificates in the election of the President of the Russian Federation in 2008 and 2012. The results of the above-mentioned election campaigns are compared, the significance of the mobile voter institution is determined as one of the guarantees for the realization of citizens' voting rights, and the advantages and disadvantages of institutions are revealed. The article concludes about the success of the introduction of the mobile voter institute, the increase in the number of voters who voted not at their place of permanent residence, as well as the importance of this institution for ensuring active electoral rights of citizens.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
