Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIMS Lymphocele after renal transplantation remains a common complication, despite all the technical precautions taken, in particular the ligation of lymphatic vessels. Its incidence varies according to the series, depending on the diagnostic methodology, and whether or not it is systematically screened. This study aims to investigate the risk factors for lymphocele and its impact on transplant survival. METHOD We performed a retrospective longitudinal descriptive study including all patients who had a kidney transplant in a Urology department from 1986 to 2017. Clinical presentation and management of lymphocele were studied. Then, the characteristics of patients who presented a lymphocele were compared with those of the rest of the population including characteristics related to the recipient, the donor, the transplant and the procedure to identify risk factors. The impact of lymphocele on patient and transplant survival was then studied. RESULTS A total of 720 patients were included with a mean age of 32.7 years. The transplant was from a living donor in 79% and a brain-dead donor in 21%. Lymphocele occurred in 51 patients (7.1%). The lymphocele was asymptomatic in 80%, and clinical manifestations were related to the compression of the transplant or its important size, requiring active treatment, most often percutaneous (13.7%). The lymphocele did not require treatment in 42 cases (82.4%) with disappearance in 90.5%. Revision surgery for a lymphocele was necessary in two cases. The risk factors for lymphocele were a cadaveric donor (P = 0.003) and an advanced age of the recipient (P < 0.001). No predictive factors related to the transplant (vascular anatomy), or procedure (location and type of anastomoses, ischemia time) were identified. Transplant survival was 77.9% at 5 years, with a median survival of 15.9 years. The occurrence of a lymphocele did not influence the survival of the transplant (P = 0.25) (Figure 1). CONCLUSION Our study showed that lymphocele is usually asymptomatic, not requiring a specific treatment in most cases with a high rate of spontaneous disappearance with no impact on transplant survival. Risk factors were a cadaveric donor which may reflect the absence of careful ligation of the transplant's lymphatic vessels in the context of urgent, sometimes multi-organ, cadaveric procurement and advanced recipient age.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call