MO663THE UTILITY OF SMART SCALES TO MONITOR BODY COMPOSITION IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims Overhydration (OH) is an independent predictor of mortality on hemodialysis (HD). The gold standard to assess OH is BCM monitor from Fresenius®, however BCM is a hospital hold device limiting its use. New smart scales have emerged as household devices reporting daily body composition data. Objective To determine if Renpho ES-CS20M® could be useful on a 52 HD patient to estimate body composition data. Method 72 body composition assessments (BCA) during mid-week HD session were performed. Each BCA included: (1) Predialysis Renpho measurement, (2) Predialysis BCM monitor measurement, (3) Postdialysis Renpho measurement. To track the fluid balance during the HD session: (1) we recorded ultrafiltration, (2) food or fluid intake was not allowed, and (3) none of the HD patients urinated during the HD session. If any intravenous fluids were needed during the HD session, we subtracted them off from UF. Results Data from 52 HD patients were studied (age 58.8 ± 16.8 years, 56.9 % males, 14.7% diabetics), with a mean pre-HD weight of 70.0 ± 13. 4 Kg, overhydration of 1.7 ± 1.5 L and urea distribution volume of 31.7 ± 5.7 L. The mean ultrafiltration during HD session was -1.8 ± 0.9 L. Renpho estimated a Pre – HD hydration of 34.25 ± 6.02 Kg vs 33.4 ± 5.7 Kg by BCM, showing a good concordance between methods (ICC 0.788 [0.67-0.86], B -0.58, p <0.01). Renpho poorly estimated pre – HD lean tissue mass at 45.4 ± 6.9 Kg compared with 33.8 ± 8.0 Kg by BCM. Although Renpho was able to provide a moderate concordant estimation of fat tissue mass (33.8 ± 8.0 % with Renpho vs 34.7 ± 9.6%), the bias proportion was unacceptable. Post- HD hydration by Renpho was not able to reproduce the ultrafiltracion achieved during the HD session (pre-HD 34.25 ± 6.02 Kg vs post-HD 34.08 ± 6.00 Kg). Conclusion Renpho has a proportional bias estimating predialysis hydration compared with BCM monitor, but is not able to assess changes produced with ultrafiltration or other parameters of body composition (as lean or fat tissue mass). Although smart scales are unacurate to assess body composition on HD patients, they could be useful on the follow up of them changing the accuracy for frequency.