MO306IGA NEPHROPATHY: A 20 YEAR RETROSPECTIVE SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims IgA nephropathy is the most common glomerulonephritis worldwide. The clinical course is heterogeneous and not always easy to predict. As such, determining which patients to treat with immunosuppression has been the cause of much debate. Over recent years there has been a focus on risk prediction to help with treatment decisions (such as the widely validated International IgA Risk Prediction Tool). Here, we present a 20 year retrospective study from a single centre with the following aims: to describe the epidemiology of our cohort, to assess outcomes (such as progression to ESKD requiring RRT, mortality), and to determine if treatment choices have changed over time. Method We collected all cases of IgA nephropathy from our biopsy database between January 2020 and December 2019. This totalled 525 biopsies. Of these, a number were excluded from analysis, including transplant biopsies and repeat biopsies in the same patient. After exclusion, the original 525 biopsies were narrowed down to 452 patients for analysis. We collected demographic data for each patient, along with creatinine and proteinuria values over time, MEST-C scores, progression to ESKD, mortality, use of RAAS blockade and immunosuppressants. Initial analysis was performed using Excel. We plan to perform further multivariate Cox regression analysis to determine if there are associations with progression to ESKD such as degree of proteinuria, MEST-C scores and immunosuppression treatment. Results We identified 452 patients with biopsy confirmed IgA nephropathy at our centre between January 2000 and December 2019. 138 (30.5%) were female and 314 (69.4%) were male. The average age at time of biopsy was 45.7 years. Mortality over this period was 19.2% (87 patients). 126 (27.9%) progressed to ESKD requiring RRT, 6 (1.3%) required temporary dialysis whilst 313 (69.2%) did not require RRT. With regards to treatment, 329 (72.8%) were treated with RAAS blockade in comparison to 85 (18.8%) who were not (in 38 patients this was unclear). No immunosuppression was used in 349 (77.2%), whilst a combination of prednisolone; IV cyclophosphamide and prednisolone; and MMF and prednisolone was used in 97 (21.5%). Conclusion We present here a large single centre dataset of IgA nephropathy patients over a 20 year period. We show that there remains a significant risk of progression to ESKD over time. It is important to identify those patients most at risk of progression early on in their disease course so that optimal treatment can be initiated. Further analysis of this dataset will allow us to assess whether treatment strategies in recent years has had a beneficial effect on outcomes, and also to assess the correlation between MEST-C scores and treatment decisions.