MO171BARRIERS TO RENAL SUPPORTIVE CARE IN SINGAPORE: A SURVEY BASED STUDY OF NEPHROLOGISTS, GERIATRICIANS AND PALLIATIVE PHYSICIANS

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims Renal supportive care is a patient-centred approach to management of advanced chronic kidney disease, especially in elderly patients. Adoption of renal supportive care in Asian countries has been slow. This study aims to investigate the barriers towards renal supportive care as perceived by physicians in Singapore. Method An online survey was sent out to all practising and training nephrologists, geriatricians and palliative physicians in Singapore public hospitals between October 1st and October 30th 2020. Responses were compiled and analysed. Results Out of 365 surveys sent, 75 nephrologists, 43 geriatricians and 28 palliative care physicians responded, accounting for a 40% response rate. Most of the participants managed 16 to 30 chronic kidney disease patients in a week. Older patients aged >75 years accounted for at least 30% of the chronic kidney disease cohort managed by 72% of respondents. Most agreed that renal supportive care aims to improve quality of life in chronic kidney disease (97.9%) and can be implemented alongside life-prolonging treatments such as dialysis (83.6%). However, only 51.4% recognised a distinction between renal supportive care and palliative care. Fewer nephrologists compared to geriatricians received prior palliative care training (54.7% vs 93.0%) or were certified advanced care planning facilitators (33.3% vs 67.4%). All respondents agreed that nephrologists should be aware of basic principles of palliative care, and 89.7% felt that palliative care should be incorporated into nephrology training. Most were comfortable holding discussions regarding dialysis withholding and withdrawal (93.8% and 87.7% respectively), and managing symptoms of pain (74.7%), breathlessness (87.0%) and anticipated symptoms after dialysis withdrawal (78.8%). Fewer physicians were comfortable with managing symptoms of pruritus (65.1%) and restless legs syndrome (56.2%). Majority (60%) did not feel confident in providing spiritual support as part of end-of-life care. Main barriers to renal supportive care included inadequate time during clinic consults to address the patients’ needs (87%), reliance on family members to make decisions (69.2%), inadequate palliative training during fellowship (67.1%) and inadequate community support services (55.5%). Some cited lack of awareness and acceptability of renal supportive care amongst patients and relatives in Singapore’s Asian cultural context. Most felt that encouraging advanced care planning discussions earlier in the course of chronic kidney disease (80.8%), having dedicated renal supportive care services in hospital (78.1%) and including palliative care rotation as part of training (69.2%) could potentially increase uptake of renal supportive care in Singapore. Conclusion Nephrologists, geriatricians and palliative physicians in Singapore recognise the value of renal supportive care, but are faced with barriers such as patients’ and family’s resistance toward renal supportive care as well as inadequate palliative training. A unique model of renal supportive care with the patient as well as family’s involvement early in the decision-making process is likely to be better perceived in Asian countries. Incorporation of palliative care training in the nephrology fellowship curriculum should be considered.