Abstract

The choice of a probability distribution function and confidence interval of estimated design values have long been of interest in flood frequency analysis. Although the four-parameter exponential gamma (FPEG) distribution has been developed for application in hydrology, its maximum likelihood estimation (MLE)-based parameter estimation method and asymptotic variance of its quantiles have not been well documented. In this study, the MLE method was used to estimate the parameters and confidence intervals of quantiles of the FPEG distribution. This method entails parameter estimation and asymptotic variances of quantile estimators. The parameter estimation consisted of a set of four equations which, after algebraic simplification, were solved using a three dimensional Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. Based on sample information matrix and Fisher’s expected information matrix, derivatives of the design quantile with respect to the parameters were derived. The method of estimation was applied to annual precipitation data from the Weihe watershed, China and confidence intervals for quantiles were determined. Results showed that the FPEG was a good candidate to model annual precipitation data and can provide guidance for estimating design values.

Highlights

  • Hydrological frequency analysis is important for planning, designing and managing water resources projects

  • The maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) is proposed for determining the parameters and confidence intervals of the four-parameter exponential gamma (FPEG) distribution

  • The asymptotic variances of the MLE quantile estimators for the FPEG distribution were expressed as a function of the probability, parameters and sample size

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hydrological frequency analysis is important for planning, designing and managing water resources projects. The design values (e.g., design flood, design rainfall) computed by frequency analysis involve uncertainties due to the sampling method, sample length, empirical frequency formula, cumulative distribution function (CDF) or probability density function (PDF), parameter estimation method, goodness-of-fit test, and extent of data extrapolation [1,2]. Among these uncertainty sources, there has been a considerable interest in the choice of CDF for a given sample, because the true CDF of a hydrological variable is unknown.

Probability Density Function and Cumulative Distribution Function
Estimation of Quantiles
Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Parameters
Confidence Intervals of Quantiles
Data and Case Study
Parameters Estimation
Goodness-of-Fit Tests and Confidence Interval Calculation
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call