Abstract

ABSTRACT What other locations are like my neighborhood? How? Why? The heart of many spatial analyses is in finding similarities or dissimilarities between locations. Discovering patterns and interpreting similarity is a complicated process that is based on both the spatial characteristics and the semantics or meaning that we assign to place. Human conceptualization of similarity in locations is multi-faceted and cannot be captured with a simple assessment of single numeric attributes like population density or median income; however, these quantifiable attributes are the basis for an initial pass of sense-making. MixMap facilitates the incorporation of similarity measures and spatial analytics to provide an information reduction (or semantic generalization) that brings the user closer to actionable insights. Through a preliminary evaluation of MixMap, we found that the tool supports the geospatial inquiry of determining similarity between regions, where participants can manipulate individual weights of the various attributes describing these locations. Based on feedback and observations from the study, we discuss potential implications and considerations for exploring the role of context and additional place-specific parameters for computing similarity, as well as understanding the nuances of semantics for place similarity in geospatial analysis tools.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call