Abstract
This article analyzes the difficulties in reproducing the actual circumstances of concrete compaction with rollers in the laboratory and mix design аfeatures of RCCP (Roller Compacted Concrete Pavement). While quick and straightforward, the Proctor compaction test may not adequately reflect the field compaction achieved with rollers. Gyratory compactors simulate the movement of the rollers, providing a more realistic situation with greater accuracy. However, they are expensive and require specialized knowledge. Due to the Vibratory hammer limited application and unrealistic vibration pattern compared to rollers, it is mostly used in laboratories for sample preparation rather than compaction. A vibrating table is effective for less rigid RCC mixture combinations and provides good compaction, although it does not perfectly simulate the action of a roller. The paper also underlines the need to create a link between density and moisture content to achieve maximum RCC performance.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.