Mitral annulus disjunction in consecutive patients undergoing cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Where is the boundary between normality and disease?

Abstract

BackgroundThe presence of mitral annulus disjunction (MAD) has been considered a high-risk feature for sudden cardiac death based on selected study populations. We aimed to assess the prevalence of MAD in consecutive patients undergoing clinically-indicated Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR), its association with ventricular arrhythmias, Mitral Valve Prolapse (MVP), and other CMR features. MethodsThis single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients referred to CMR at our Institution between June 2021 and November 2021. The MAD was defined as a ≥1mm displacement between the left atrial wall-mitral valve leaflet junction and the left ventricular wall during end-systole. The MAD extent was defined as the maximum longitudinal displacement. Associates of MAD were evaluated at uni- and multi-variariable regression analysis. A study endpoint including (aborted) sudden cardiac death, unexplained syncope, and sustained ventricular tachycardia was evaluated at 12-month follow-up. ResultsFour-hundred-forty-one patients (55±18 years, 61% males) were included, and 29 (7%) had MVP. The prevalence of MAD ≥1mm, 4mm, and 6mm were 214 (49%), 63 (14%), and 15 (3%), respectively. Patients with MVP showed a higher prevalence of MAD greater than 1mm (90% vs. 46%; p<0.001), 4mm (48% vs. 12%; p<0.001), and 6mm (10% vs. 3%; p=0.03), and a greater MAD extent (4.2mm, 3.0-5.7mm vs. 2.8mm, 1.9-4.0mm; p<0.001) than patients without MVP. The MVP was the only morpho-functional abnormality associated with MAD at multivariable analysis (p<0.001). A high burden of ventricular ectopic beats at baseline Holter-ECG was associated with MAD ≥4mm and MAD extent (p<0.05). The presence of MAD ≥1mm (0.9% vs. 1.8%; p=0.46), MAD ≥4mm (1.6% vs. 1.3%; p=0.87), or MVP (3.5% vs. 1.2%; p=0.32) were not associated with the study endpoint, whereas patients with MAD ≥6mm showed a trend towards a higher likelihood of the study endpoint (6.7% vs. 1.2%; p=0.07). ConclusionsA MAD of limited entity was common in consecutive patients undergoing CMR. Patients with MVP showed higher prevalence and greater extent of MAD. Extended MAD was rarer and showed association with ventricular arrhythmias at baseline. The mid-term prognosis of MAD seems benign, however prospective studies are warranted to search for potential “malignant MAD extents” to improve patients’ risk stratification.