Abstract

Abstract Background Patients with calcific aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) usually have calcification in other cardiac structures, especially mitral annulus. Severity of mitral annular calcification (MAC) and degree of mitral stenosis (MS) may be associated with hemodynamic effects and outcomes. Purpose We sought to investigate the prevalence of MAC in patients with severe calcific AS using mitral annular calcium score with Agatston method from cardiac computerized tomography (CT). We also aim to assess the severity grading of MAC and its association with the severity of MS evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of the TAVI registry at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital between May 2013 and December 2021. Clinical information was extracted from medical records. The pre-TAVI echocardiography and cardiac CT were reviewed, as well as the mitral annular calcium score. The severity of MAC (no, mild, moderate, severe) was classified using cardiac CT per the modified Cleveland clinic classification system. The MS grading was based on the 2009 American society of echocardiography guidelines. MAC prevalence was studied. Analysis of the association between MAC and MS was conducted. Results Our cohort included a total of 188 patients (mean age of 81±8 years). 134 patients (71.3%) demonstrated evidence of MAC. 47 patients (25%) had severe MAC evaluated by cardiac CT. Among patients with severe MAC, mean age was 83±8 years, 29 patients (63%) were female, 14 patients (30%) had diabetes, and 11 (23%) of them were associated with moderate or severe MS. Patients with MAC were significantly associated with hemodynamically significant MS (moderate or severe) when compared with patients without MAC (p <0.001). Conclusions One-fourth of patients with severe calcific AS underwent TAVI had severe MAC. The hemodynamically significant MS was more prevalent as the severity of MAC increased. The association between MAC and long-term adverse clinical outcomes needs to be further investigated.Figure 1Figure 2

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.