Abstract

Because Kemp’s ridley sea turtles (Lepidochelys kempii) are critically endangered and closely related to the vulnerable olive ridleys (L. olivacea), it is essential for forensic investigations and conservation efforts to distinguish these species when only skeletal elements remain. DNA extraction and analysis by DNA sequencing of genetic markers is the only method to determine species identity reliably, yet these methods are significantly compromised when DNA becomes degraded. To evaluate the role that time and environment play in obtaining high-quality DNA sequencing data, we placed skeletal elements of a terrestrial mammal (Bos taurus) and L. kempii in a supratidal and subtidal environment for 3 years. Bi-annual sampling revealed that after 3 years, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) consistently identified each species from each environment. Our results show that mtDNA recovery from bone and identification for Kemp’s ridley sea turtles was possible up to 3 years in both environments. All sequencing data obtained was accurate and robust, but DNA sequencing results were not consistent after 664-days of exposure. Our findings led us to conclude that if sufficient DNA is extracted from bone samples, then high-quality sequence data can be obtained, and the resulting sequence data accurately reflects the reference sequence for the given gene marker. This study provides evidence that DNA can be extracted and analyzed from challenging biological substrates, like bone, when these substrates are exposed to seasonally dynamic maritime environmental conditions for up to 3-years.

Highlights

  • Modern forensic and conservation investigations depend heavily on DNA samples for the identification of individuals and/or populations of species

  • We used domestic cattle (Bos taurus) bones as a terrestrial mammal control specimen to evaluate the length of time amplifiable DNA can be obtained after environmental exposure and the effectiveness of Proteinase K (Pro K) vs. Collagenase Type II (CTII) in bone demineralization during DNA extraction

  • Using the log10 of the average DNA quantities acquired from the triplicate samples, significantly (P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA) more DNA was recovered from the L. kempii (Pro K mean: 0.985 and CTII mean: 0.935) samples than from B. taurus (Pro K mean: 0.252 and CTII mean: 0.263) samples

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Modern forensic and conservation investigations depend heavily on DNA samples for the identification of individuals and/or populations of species. The importance of environmental exposure has been well documented in soft tissues (e.g., blood, saliva); for example, UV light (Hall et al, 2014), high levels of humidity and temperature (Dissing et al, 2010; Al-Kandari et al, 2016), and submergence in fresh or saltwater (Borde et al, 2008; Frippiat et al, 2017; Helmus et al, 2018; Meixner et al, 2020) These studies investigated a controlled set of variables in a laboratory setting, rather than field exposures, and often for only days or weeks. A more comprehensive knowledge of DNA longevity in maritime skeletal remains, in endangered and threatened species, informs conservation, protection, and research initiatives

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call