Abstract

Ambiguity resolution (AR) is critical for achieving a fast, high-precision solution in precise point positioning (PPP). In the standard uncombined PPP (S-UPPP) method, ionosphere-free code biases are superimposed by ambiguity and receiver clock offsets to be estimated. However, besides the time-constant part of the receiver code bias, the complex and time-varying term in receivers destroy the stability of ambiguities and degrade the performance of the UPPP AR. The variation of receiver code bias can be confirmed by the analysis in terms of ionospheric observables, code multipath (MP) of the Melbourne–Wübbena (MW) combination and the ionosphere-free combination. Therefore, the effect of receiver code biases should be rigorously mitigated. We introduce a modified UPPP (M-UPPP) method to reduce the effects of receiver code biases in ambiguities and to decouple the correlation between receiver clock parameters, code biases, and ambiguities parameters. An extra receiver code bias is set to isolate the code biases from ambiguities. The more stable ambiguities without code biases are expected to achieve a higher success rate of ambiguity resolution and a shortened convergence time. The variations of the receiver code biases, which are the unmodeled errors in measurement residuals of the S-UPPP method, can be estimated in the M-UPPP method. The maximum variation of the code biases is up to 16 ns within two-hour data. In the M-UPPP method, the averaged epoch residuals for code and phase measurements recover their zero-mean features. For the ambiguity-fixed solutions in the M-UPPP method, the convergence times are 14 and 43 min with 17.7% and 69.2% improvements compared to that in the S-UPPP method which are 17 and 90 min under the 68% and 95% confidence levels.

Highlights

  • A major problem in facilitating precise point positioning (PPP) ambiguity resolution is that the undifferenced ambiguities are not integer values, due to the existence of the code and phase delay biases [1,2,3,4,5,6]

  • Similar as in the decoupled clock model (DC) method for decoupling the code and phase clock parameters, we isolated receiver code bias from the phase ambiguities to improve the performance of PPP or ambiguity resolution

  • The code bias variations were analyzed with carrier-to-code leveling (CCL) and the uncombined PPP (UPPP) method by using the single different ionospheric observables

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A major problem in facilitating precise point positioning (PPP) ambiguity resolution is that the undifferenced ambiguities are not integer values, due to the existence of the code and phase delay biases [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Fractional-cycle biases (FCB) in global navigation satellite system (GNSS) phase measurements must be corrected or removed in order to recover the integer property of ambiguities [2,7,8,9,10,11,12]. These biases are hardware-dependent and exist in all receivers and satellites [13]. The natures of the temporal scale variation of receiver code biases have already been analyzed by many previous studies, and many different approaches have been adopted to deal with them in ionosphere modeling [30,31,32]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call