Abstract

Objetivou-se avaliar o efeito de diferentes agroquímicos na reversão da fitotoxidez do glyphosate (Roundup WG 0,06 kg ha -1 ) em feijoeiro (Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Carioca), a aplicação do herbicida foi realizada em todas as plantas exceto na testemunha absoluta, aos 31 dias após o plantio (DAP), no estádio de 3° trifólio. Aos 36 DAP, as plantas foram tratadas com: ácido fúlvico 25% (1000 ml ha -1 e 2000 ml ha -1 ), aminoácido (500 ml ha -1 e 1000 ml ha -1 ), fosfito (2000 ml ha -1 e 4000 ml ha -1 ), além de bioestimulante (250 ml ha -1 e 500 ml ha -1 ). Aos 36, 40, 46 e 54 DAP foram conferidas notas às plantas e aos 54 DAP as plantas foram coletadas e determinou-se a área foliar e a massa seca de três plantas. Pelas notas conferidas verificou-se que somente a testemunha absoluta e o aminoácido 500 ml ha -1 apresentaram menores danos do que o tratamento com glyphosate. A área foliar somente mostrou-se maior na testemunha absoluta, sendo que a massa seca revelou-se superior na testemunha absoluta e nos tratamentos com aminoácido 500 e 1000 ml ha -1 . Abstract Glyphosate is an herbicide widely used in agriculture. However, it may causes phytotoxic effects on non-target plants (crops), generating productivity losses. Currently there are evidences about agrochemicals as potential mitigators of glyphosate side effects. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of distinct doses of fulvic acid 25% (k tionic® 1000 and 2000 mL ha-1), amino acids (Codamin BR® 500 and 1000 mL ha-1), phosphite (Nutex0-30-20®, 2000 and 4000 mL ha-1) and biostimulant (Byozime TF® 250 and 500 mL ha -1) in reversion of fitotoxicity caused by glyphosate on ‘Carioca’ common bean plants. For comparison, plants treated only with glyphosate, and untreated plants (control) were also evaluated. Glyphosate spray (Roundup WG 0.06 kg ha -1) was performed at 31 days after planting (DAP), and agrochemicals were applied at 36 DAP. Phytotoxicity symptoms, as well as leaf area, dry mass of leaves and stems, and physiological indexes were evaluated at 54 DAP. Application of amino acid-based product (500 mL ha-1) significantly reduced (29.90%) phytotoxicity symptoms. Both doses of amino acid-based product increased dry mass of leaves; therefore, they were able to maintain the leaf weight ratio similar to the control plants. However, there was a decrease in leaf area, which was not reverted by any of the agrochemicals. It is concluded that application of amino acid-based product Codamin BR 500 mL ha-1) reduces, even partially, glyphosate phytotoxicity in ‘Carioca’ common bean plants.

Highlights

  • Tillage system is used in approximately 25 million hectares, representing 50% of the area with annual crops in Brazil

  • The in vivo stability of glyphosate contributes to its irreversible phytotoxic effects (GRUYS; SIKORSKI, 1999)

  • These scores were according to the scale of visual assessment of herbicides phytotoxicity proposed by European Weed Research Council (EWRC, 1964), ranging from 1 to 9

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tillage system is used in approximately 25 million hectares, representing 50% of the area with annual crops in Brazil. The adoption of this practice was possible due to development of herbicides, among which glyphosate is the most used (YAMADA et al, 2009). The fast translocation of glyphosate from treated leaves to roots, rhizomes. In addition of drift and residual glyphosate in soil, this herbicide may be transferred from target (weed) to non-target plants (crop), through contact among roots (RODRIGUES et al, 1982). Other symptoms in leaves are wrinkling or malformations (especially in growth areas) and necrosis of meristem, rhizomes and stolons of perennial plants (GRUYS; SIKORSKI, 1999)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.