Abstract

The risk of inhalation exposure to elevated concentrations of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and ammonia (NH3) during the agitation of stored swine manure is high. Once or twice a year, farmers agitate manure before pump-out and application to fields. Agitation of the swine manure causes the short-term releases of highly toxic levels of H2S and NH3. In our previous pilot-scale studies, the biochar powder showed significant mitigation of H2S and NH3 emissions when it was surficially applied to manure immediately before agitation. However, fine biochar powder application poses hazards by itself and may not be practical to apply on a farm scale, especially when livestock and workers are present. We hypothesized that applying pelletized biochar to manure surfaces is just as effective as applying powder to protect farmers and animals from excessive exposure to H2S and NH3. This work reports on the lab-scale proof-of-the-concept trials with biochar pellets on the lab scale. The objective was to compare the biochar pellets and biochar powder on their effectiveness of mitigation on H2S and NH3 gases during 3-h-long swine manure agitation. Three scenarios were compared in (n = 3) trials: (i) control, (ii) 12.5 mm thick surficial application to manure surface of biochar powder, and (iii) an equivalent (by mass) dose of pelletized biochar applied to the manure surface. The biochar powder was bound with 35% (wt) water into ~5 × 10 mm (dia × length) pellets. The biochar powder was significantly (p < 0.05) more effective than the biochar pellets. Still, pellets reduced total H2S and NH3 emissions by ~72% and ~68%, respectively (p = 0.001), compared with ~99% by powder (p = 0.001). The maximum H2S and NH3 concentrations were reduced from 48.1 ± 4.8 ppm and 1810 ± 850 ppm to 20.8 ± 2.95 ppm and 775 ± 182 ppm by pellets, and to 22.1 ± 16.9 ppm and 40.3 ± 57 ppm by powder, respectively. These reductions are equivalent to reducing the maximum concentrations of H2S and NH3 during the 3-h manure agitation by 57% and 57% (pellets) and 54% and 98% (powder), respectively. Treated manure properties hinted at improved nitrogen retention, yet they were not significant due to high variability. We recommend scaling up and trials on the farm-scale level using biochar pellets to assess the feasibility of application to large manure surfaces and techno-economic evaluation.

Highlights

  • Animal production provides an excellent source of fertilizer in the form of manure for crop production

  • The experiment evaluated three scenarios with n = 3 replication during 3 h of manu4roef 14 agitation: (i) control, (ii) 12.5 mm (1⁄2 inch) thick surficial application to manure surface of biochar powder, and (iii) and an equivalent dose of pelletized biochar applied to the manure surface

  • Some dissolved pellets fragments and powder were suspended in the manure after application (Figure A1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Animal production provides an excellent source of fertilizer in the form of manure for crop production. The animal production system’s sustainability depends on the efficient carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling between manure, crops, and animal feed. Swine manure is generated and stored year round. Manure can be utilized by crops seasonally, typically before seed planting and/or after the harvest. Stored manure requires pump-out and emptying to make room for a continued farm operation. Short-term (hours) agitation of manure is required to stir up and incorporate settled solids into a slurry that pumps can handle. Manure agitation is facilitated by using a high-capacity pump with recirculation for a vigorous mechanical stirring of settled manure solids at the bottom of the storage pit

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call