Abstract
This study explores answers to the following questions: To what extent are the provisions in international joint venture agreements affected by the institutional distance between countries of partners? And how can IJV partners mitigate institutional distance? Using fine-grained data on 251 international joint venture contracts signed in between 2000 and 2016, we identified all contact provisions/clauses used in IJVs and classified them into three groups of clauses, namely (1) management & organization, (2) control, and (3) operation through factor analysis. We then linked the three groups to the multiple dimensions of institutional distance (i.e., cross-country differences in legal environment, the court, normative, and cultural-cognitive). Empirical results reveal that the control clauses are more frequently used when there is a greater degree of legal environment distance and court distance. However, the need to use the control clauses is mitigated by the choice of law clause choosing a governing law country that is different than the location of IJVs. Normative distance increases the frequency of operation and management & organization clauses. Finally, the use of management & organization and control clauses is increased when there is a greater degree of cognitive distance. These findings provide insightful implications to industry practitioners, extend the Transaction Cost Economics, and advance alliance governance literature as well as institutional theory.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have